“After Apple-picking” Robert Frost and “Prospero’s Epilogue” by William Shakespeare Essay

There are solely a select few individuals in this world that could be considered as exceptional. There are many capital names in the world of literature, but this composition would only focus on two keen writers and their respective work. William Shakespeare is considered by many as the great writer that has ever lived. He is even nicknamed the fadeless by literature enthusiasts. On the other throw Robert freezing is a great poet, whose works had taken the verse genre by storm. This paper impart make a comparison of two works of these two great writers Shakespeares Epilogue for Prospero and icing the pucks After Apple-Picking. The two works were communicated down the stairs the same medium, poetry. Both works were utilizing poetic devices such(prenominal) as symbolism, imagery, alliteration, etc. The function of both works is to assault the emotions of the readers. After Apple-Picking is a poem well-nigh writing a poem. Frost tells the readers that writing poetry is an a rduous task I am overtired (Line 29) moreover that tiredness of a poet could be relieved by the audience appreciation of the great harvest I myself desired. The image of the many apples is a symbol for creativeness. Frost is simply arguing that at that place is an abundance of creativitythe problem is that harvesting that creativity could tire issue an artist. On the other hand, Shakespeares words through with(predicate) Prospero is specifically categorized as a soliloquy. This grouchy literary technique is made famous by Shakespearean plays, like in Hamlets to be or not to be soliloquy. A soliloquy is basically done when a event of the play directly addresses the audience. In traditional theater, there is the existence of the fourth wall.The fourth wall is extremely technical to discuss but it basically refers to the shift between the actors and the audience. In other terms, the heartyity in the stage is very far from the reality of real life. Formalistically in plays, a character should never move with the audience, simply because it ruins the illusion. This may be the very come of Shakespeare for Prosperos soliloquy. Shakespeare does not want his work to be a mere illusion, he wanted it to be something real. And according to the text, what could make it real, or Prospero free, is only the laudation of the audience.ConclusionShakespeares message is no disparate with Frosts. During Prosperos epilogue, Prospero is simply asking for an applause to set him free without applause / my plan to delight you has failedIt is similar in both of the works to fuck that there is an audience. Both of them may have simply saying that the readers/audiences are just as outstanding as the piece itself. If it was not for the appreciation of those who make merry the beauty of words, literature would not exists.ReferencesFrost, Robert. After Apple-picking. Retrieved 5 June 2008Shakespeare, William. The Tempest. Retrieved 5 June 2008 shakespeare.mit.edu/tempest/fu ll.html